Of course, for us, “A Superhero” is the organ donor. Some are brave enough to volunteer for a living donation. These are the real heroes of life:
How is it going in Germany
1. Because not enough living kidney donations seem to be accepted.
Who’s to blame? Ethics committee
2. Because it creates a counter-productive debate between the medical professions
would. Normally no doctor would allow this in humans, just because of it the doctor’s pledge!?
Who is to blame: Medical economist
3. Because then the former living donors, through the enlightenment (the factors that
has led to renal insufficiency) already legally disempowered
would flare up, also because of ethics.
Guilty: Society
How is it going in Türkiye
1. Annually in the Turkish hospitals up to 80 percent of the entire kidney donation contingent made possible by living donations.
2. Nobody recorded the consequences (or eyed it critically), just like them questioning whether it is in this magnitude is ethically correct.
3. There is also no great effort by the WHO’s Brain Death Diagnosis Program among the transplant doctors, since the majority of the population denies that likewise, the transplant system has been obsolete for over 40 years. (Türkish transplant Law), PDF
The biggest hero for us: “Brain death organ donor“
Some people, in such a very painful situation, are able to allow their relatives to donate organs. The OPT-IN-regulation Method, which is active in the current “transplant act” in Turkey and also Germany, realizes this.
“But today, there are creatures who can misuse medical knowledge and use organ donation in a bad light by scaring people. For example, within the meaning of “brain death is not real death”. Such people throw fake news from Youtube and other social media networks. Down with the believers!”
Brain death organ donation: It is the organ donation donated by the relatives of people who have a brain death diagnosis. However, this does not happen in Turkey because it is a sensitive issue and there are not enough responsive (only specialist in this sensitive situation) transplant doctors in hospitals (less than 20% of all organ donations are post-brain transplant, means in Türkiye). This problem exists also in germany, but in otherwise. Read more
The biggest reason for this low number and a big suffering for organ sick humans is ‘incomplete body integrity’, also the ignorance of politicians.
Approach: Misunderstanding the causal relationship
“Opt-out rules in transplantation medicine and human rights”
People, including health politicians, misunderstand causal relations in transplantation medicine (here postmortem organ removal) and then, in the Bundestag election (on January 16th, 2020, when it came to the contradiction solution-legislative debate in Germany), came/come to a “No “.
How come? Because they still define postmortem organ removal in transplantation medicine as “organ donation”.
However, the word “organ donation” should only apply to the “decision to donate living organs”.
The “organ donation” is of course a voluntary decision of each individual, since the word already defines it: DONATION. Sure, but in the case of postmortem organ removal is completely out of place. Here, people completely confuse the connections.
Since people define the post-mortem organ removal, here something that no longer belongs to them, as a donation, one still concludes with an understanding of donation. Is that right? No.
If the objection regulation were to come into force now and the organs would be removed without the approval of the “relatives”, one would conclude that it was a violation of human rights.
But it can’t be one if this intensive care patient is defined as dead. See brain death diagnosis
The connection between the objection regulation and the violation of human rights is therefore misinterpreted in this case if it is defined as death.
Now the question of the brain death diagnosis.
When someone arrives at the hospital to have their life saved, the doctors and staff are the only ones who can do it. So can save or let die.
So if someone doesn’t accept the diagnosis of brain death, then you shouldn’t go to the hospital.
So in intensive care all options have been exhausted, no chance of survival and brain death is declared, this person is declared death.
Why is politics still disguised as human rights here?
Human rights can only be pleaded in the case of living organ donation and not in the case of postmortem organ removal.